We're more connected than ever, and because of that, the need for application security is also increasing. If you use a smartphone, laptop, or any device, then this concerns you. Surprisingly, a large number of apps we use daily have vulnerabilities – weak spots that hackers could potentially exploit. Did you know that there are 101 apps with trojan viruses on the Google Play Store? What's worse is - these apps have over 421 million downloads.
This blog is all about peeling back the layers of application vulnerabilities. These aren't just technical glitches; they're potential risks that could affect any of us. We're going to explore some of the most common types of vulnerabilities that have been making the rounds in the past few years. Think of SQL Injection, where a seemingly harmless input field on a website can turn into a hacker's playground, or Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), which can turn a trusted website into a launchpad for malicious scripts.
So, whether you're a security engineer, a developer, or just someone who loves using apps (and who doesn't?), this blog is for you. It's about understanding the threats and learning how we can protect ourselves in this digital age.
App Vulnerability #1: Injection Flaws
App Vulnerability #2: Broken Authentication
App Vulnerability #3: Sensitive data exposure
App Vulnerability #4: XML External Entities (XXE)
App Vulnerability #5: Broken Access Control
App Vulnerability #6: Security Misconfiguration
App Vulnerability #7: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
App Vulnerability #8: Insecure Deserialization
App Vulnerability #9: Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities
App Vulnerability #10: Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
App Vulnerability #11: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
App Vulnerability #12: API Security Vulnerabilities
Application security is an ongoing journey
Injection flaws stand as one of the most critical and prevalent security vulnerabilities in application development. They occur when an application sends untrusted data to an interpreter as part of a command or query. The attacker's hostile data can trick the interpreter into executing unintended commands or accessing unauthorized data. Injection flaws can exist in any part of an application that accepts input, and it can affect SQL databases, NoSQL databases, LDAP servers, or any other code that parses input data.
The Heartland Payment Systems hack in 2008 was one of the most significant data breaches in history that involved SQL Injection. 130 million credit and debit card numbers were compromised, which resulted in substantial financial losses, legal repercussions, and a damaged reputation.
Broken authentication is when the authentication process in an application is flawed and allows attackers to compromise passwords, keys, or session tokens or to exploit other implementation flaws to assume other users' identities. Session Management, on the other hand, involves maintaining a user's state and data across multiple requests. Vulnerabilities in session management can lead to session hijacking, where an attacker takes over a user's session, gaining unauthorized access to their data and functionalities within the application.
In 2018, Marriott International, a popular hotel chain, suffered a massive data breach that exemplified how damaging the impact of broken authentication is. The breach affected Marriott's Starwood division, and it was partly due to vulnerabilities in their authentication process. Attackers exploited these weaknesses to gain unauthorized access to the reservation system and compromise the personal data of about 500 million guests. This information leak included sensitive information like names, contact details, passport numbers, and even credit card numbers in some cases. The incident not only resulted in substantial financial losses for Marriott but also raised significant concerns about data privacy and security in large organizations.
Sensitive data exposure risks arise when an application fails to adequately secure sensitive information like personal data, financial details, or confidential business information. It can lead to a range of issues, from identity theft and financial fraud to significant reputational damage for the organization responsible for safeguarding this data.
Yahoo disclosed in 2016 that at least 500 million user accounts were affected by a breach in 2014. The exposed data included names, email addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, hashed passwords, and in some cases, encrypted or unencrypted security questions and answers. The impact of the breach was extensive, not only because of the sheer volume of affected users but also due to the sensitivity of the exposed data. It compromised the personal and security information of half a billion people, which led to potential identity theft and fraud risks.
XML External Entities (XXE) attacks are a type of security vulnerability that targets applications parsing XML input. They occur when an application processes XML input that includes a reference to an external entity, which can lead to unintended consequences.
The SolarWinds cyber attack in 2020 involved the exploitation of vulnerabilities within the SolarWinds Orion software that affected numerous government agencies and large corporations. Part of this attack included the exploitation of an XXE vulnerability, which allowed attackers to interfere with the processing of XML data within the software. Manipulating XML inputs, the attackers were able to insert malicious code and compromise the integrity of the software's operations. This breach not only highlighted the severity of XXE attacks but also underscored the importance of securing software against such vulnerabilities.
Broken access control vulnerabilities occur when an application fails to properly enforce restrictions on what authenticated users are allowed to do. Essentially, this flaw happens when users can perform actions or access data that they are not supposed to. This can include viewing sensitive files, modifying other users' data, or accessing administrative functions. Broken access control stems from inadequate enforcement of access control rules by the application that lets users bypass these rules and exploit the system's functionalities beyond their intended permissions.
In the United States Postal Service (USPS) data breach in 2018, a vulnerability in the USPS website exposed the personal data of over 60 million users. The flaw was in the API of the USPS "Informed Visibility" service, which was designed to provide businesses with real-time tracking data. However, due to broken access control, any authenticated user on the USPS website could access not only their own account details but also the data of other users, including email addresses, usernames, user IDs, account numbers, street addresses, phone numbers, and mailing campaign data. This breach was a result of inadequate access control measures that highlight the importance of robust access control systems in protecting sensitive user data.
Security misconfiguration is a common vulnerability that occurs when an application or server is not securely configured, often leading to unnecessary security risks. It can happen at any level of an application stack, including network services, platforms, web servers, database servers, frameworks, custom code, and pre-installed virtual machines, containers, or storage. Misconfigurations can result from using default configurations or incomplete configurations, open cloud storage, unnecessary services running, and verbose error messages containing sensitive information.
The Equifax data breach in 2017 is one of the largest in history, and it was primarily due to a security misconfiguration in the company's web application framework, Apache Struts. Equifax failed to properly update their software, which leaves a known vulnerability unpatched. This oversight allowed attackers to exploit the vulnerability and gain access to the company's systems. As a result, the personal information of approximately 147 million consumers, including names, Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses, and in some cases, driver's license numbers, was compromised. Additionally, credit card numbers for approximately 209,000 U.S. consumers were also accessed.
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) is a web security vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. It happens when an application includes untrusted data on a web page without proper validation or escaping that enables attackers to execute scripts in the victim's browser context. These scripts can access any cookies, session tokens, or other sensitive information retained by the browser and used with that site. XSS attacks can also deface websites or redirect users to malicious sites, making them a significant threat to web application security.
The vulnerability works by exploiting the trust a user has for a particular site. Since the malicious script comes from what seems to be a trusted source, the victim's browser executes the script. The attacker can use this vulnerability to bypass access controls such as the same-origin policy, which is designed to segregate different websites from each other within the browser.
Insecure deserialization is a vulnerability that arises when an application deserializes data from untrusted sources without adequate precautions. Deserialization is the process of converting data structured from some format (like JSON, XML, or binary formats) into an object in a programming language. When this process is not securely managed, it can lead to serious security issues.
Using components with known vulnerabilities refers to the risk associated with incorporating third-party components, such as libraries or frameworks, into an application without addressing known security flaws within these components. This arises when outdated or unpatched software components are used, which may contain security holes that have been publicly disclosed and can be exploited by attackers. The risk is aggravated by the fact that these vulnerabilities are often well-documented and easily accessible to attackers, which makes applications that use such components prime targets for exploitation.
Insufficient logging and monitoring in application security is the failure to adequately track and record actions within an application, which can prevent or delay the detection of malicious activities or policy violations. It happens when an application does not generate enough logs, especially concerning events that could indicate a security incident, or when the monitoring systems are not strong enough to alert the team in real time about potential breaches. Without sufficient logging and monitoring, attacks such as data breaches, system intrusions, and ongoing malicious activities can go unnoticed for extended periods, which can increase the damage caused by such incidents.
In the Target data breach in 2013, attackers stole credit and debit card information from 40 million Target customers. It happened through a third-party HVAC vendor, which attackers used to gain access to Target's network. Despite having a security system that detected the breach, the lack of effective logging and monitoring meant that the alerts were not adequately followed up. The breach went unnoticed for weeks, which gave the attackers time to collect data and compromise millions of accounts.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is a web security vulnerability that lets an attacker induce users to perform actions that they do not intend to on a web application in which they are authenticated. In a CSRF attack, the attacker exploits the trust that a web application has in a user's browser. It's when a malicious website, email, or program causes a user's web browser to perform an unwanted action on a trusted site for which the user is currently authenticated. The attacker tricks the victim into making a request (like transferring funds or changing an email address) that uses the user's authentication credentials without their knowledge, essentially performing actions on behalf of the user.
API (Application Programming Interface) security vulnerabilities occur when the interfaces that allow software applications to communicate with each other are not adequately protected. This can lead to a range of security issues, as APIs often expose business logic and sensitive data. The growing reliance on APIs in modern software development, especially with the rise of cloud services and microservices architectures, has made API security increasingly important. Vulnerabilities in APIs can lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, and service disruptions.
2,220 cyber attacks everyday, that's one every 39 seconds. In a world where data breaches are the norm, security has become a collective responsibility.
Application security is not a one-time task but an ongoing process. It involves staying informed about the latest threats, continuously updating and testing systems, and fostering a culture of security awareness within organizations. Tools and technologies play a crucial role, but they must be complemented by proactive policies, regular audits, and a commitment to best practices.
AppSecEngineer offers a comprehensive suite of training programs specifically designed for businesses and enterprises looking to enhance their application security skills. Our platform provides a hands-on, full-stack security training environment, focusing on a variety of crucial areas such as Cloud Security, Kubernetes, DevSecOps, and more. Our training programs represent a valuable resource for businesses seeking to enhance their application security posture, combining expert knowledge with practical, real-world application.
The responsibility to fortify these applications against threats lies with everyone involved in the application lifecycle – from developers and security professionals to end-users – to contribute to a safer digital ecosystem.
Vishnu Prasad is a DevSecOps Lead at we45. A DevSecOps and Security Automation wizard, he has implemented security in DevOps for numerous Fortune 500 companies. Vishnu has experience in Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery across various verticals, using tools like Jenkins, Selenium, Docker, and other DevOps tools. His role sees him automating SAST, DAST, and SCA security tools at every phase of the build pipeline. He commands knowledge of every major security tool out there, including ZAP, Burp, Findsecbugs, and npm audit, among many others. He's a tireless innovator, having Dockerized his entire security automation process for cross-platform support to build pipelines seamlessly. When AFK, he is either pouring over Investment journals or in the swimming pool.