End-of-Year Special: Blow that Budget Sale! More seats, bigger savings.

Ninja-Level Security with Unit Testing and TDD

PUBLISHED:
November 13, 2024
|
BY:
Abhay Bhargav
Ideal for
Pentester
Security Engineer

A lot of small businesses go out of business within six months of a cyberattack. Security breaches ruin lives, businesses, and reputations. So, I don’t really get why some wait for a security issue to escalate into a full-blown disaster before they address it during the development stage.

Integrating security unit testing and Test-Driven Development (TDD) early in the development process can significantly improve your software's security. Making sure that you're doing security checks within your unit tests will help you detect vulnerabilities early and that your codebase remains secure against cyber threats.

There's a lot to talk about when it comes to security unit security testing, like why incorporating them into your development workflow is important. Let's see if I can convince you that proactive security testing can save your organization from potential chaos and keep your software resilient. You ready?

Table of Contents:

  1. What is Security Unit Testing?
    1. Common Security Issues That Security Unit Tests Can Address
  2. How Test-Driven Development(TDD) Enhances Security
    1. Steps Involved in TDD
    2. Benefits of TDD in Improving Security
  3. Current Practices in Security Testing
    1. Challenges of Late-Stage Security Testing
  4. How Does Unit Testing Compare to Other Types of Testing?
  5. Applications That Are Secure From The Ground Up

What is Security Unit Testing?

Security unit testing involves writing and executing tests that focus specifically on security aspects of your code. It's not like traditional unit testing where you have to validate the functionality of each individual component. Instead, security unit tests focus on finding and mitigating potential vulnerabilities before they become exploitable. Here are some benefits when you detect security vulnerabilities early in the development process:

  • Detecting security issues early minimizes the chances of exploitation.
  • It's so much cheaper than post-deployment patches.
  • You’re sure that you have a robust and secure codebase.
  • Helps meet regulatory and industry standards for security.
  • Security incidents will be prevented before they can damage your organization’s reputation.
  • Encourages a security-first mindset among developers.

Common Security Issues That Security Unit Tests Can Address

Here are some of the common vulnerabilities that you will be safe from once you decide to incorporate security unit testing into your security practices:

Authorization Flaws

Authorization flaws are when a system doesn't adequately enforce permissions that allow users to perform actions beyond the intended privileges. With security unit tests, you can rest easy that users can only access resources and perform actions that they are explicitly permitted to. For example, a test can verify that a standard user cannot access administrative functionalities or sensitive data meant for higher privilege levels.

Access Control Issues

Access control issues will happen when systems don't have proper restrictions on resource access. You're facing unauthorized data access or modification. Security unit tests can check for proper implementation of access controls to make sure that users can only access data and functionalities that they are allowed to.

Injection Attacks

Injection attacks like SQL injection happen when untrusted data is sent to an interpreter as part of a command or query. There will be the execution of unintended commands or accessing unauthorized data. Security unit tests will detect these vulnerabilities by validating input sanitization and making sure that user inputs are properly escaped before being used in database queries or command executions.

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities will give attackers the capability to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. These scripts can steal cookies, session tokens, or other sensitive information. Security unit tests can detect potential XSS vulnerabilities by simulating malicious input and verifying that it is properly sanitized before being displayed in the user interface.

Buffer Overflows

Buffer overflow vulnerabilities occur when a program writes more data to a buffer than it can hold. It leads to data corruption or arbitrary code execution. Having security unit test in your security practices will help you detect buffer overflow issues by testing boundary conditions and make sure that buffers are adequately sized and properly managed to prevent overflow scenarios.

Authentication Weaknesses

Authentication weaknesses will let attackers bypass authentication mechanisms to have unauthorized access to your system. Security unit tests will make sure that authentication mechanisms are robust by validating password strength requirements, multi-factor authentication enforcement, and resistance to common attacks like brute force or credential stuffing.

How Test-Driven Development(TDD) Enhances Security

Here’s the gist: Test-Driven Development, or TDD, is when your tests are written before the actual code. Adopting this method will make sure that your code is developed to pass the predefined tests and, at the same time, encourage a test-first mindset that will improve software quality and security in the long run.

In TDD, developers write tests for a new function or feature before writing the code to implement it. Your goal is to create small, incremental improvements in code quality and maintainability. The focus is on testing from the outset to detect defects early and encourage writing cleaner, more modular code.

Steps Involved in TDD

Write a Test

The first step is to write a test for the feature or functionality. Here's what you’ll do:

  • Define the test case by clearly specifying what the code is supposed to do. Set up any required preconditions and define what are your expected outcomes.
  • Choose the right testing framework that is suitable for your programming language and project. Popular choices are JUnit for Java, pytest for Python, and Jest for JavaScript.
  • Write code that will test your desired functionality. Expect that this test will fail because you haven’t implemented the functionality yet. The tests should be as specific as possible and focus on one aspect of the functionality at a time.

Write the Code

After you’ve written the test, the next step is to write the actual code that will pass the test. It involves:

  • Write enough code that will pass the requirements of the test. Your goal is to get the test to pass with minimal implementation by focusing on correctness over-optimization.
  • Run the test frequently to check if the new code will pass. Be on the lookout for immediate feedback and make sure that the code is meeting all the specified requirements.
  • Keep the implementation simple and straightforward. You don’t have to overengineer anything. Again, the goal here is to make the text pass, not add features or optimize.

Refactor

After the test passes, the last step is to refactor the code. Here:

  • Clean up the code by removing any redundancies, improve readability, and guarantee that it’s adhering to coding standards. You might need to rename variables, simplify complex logic, and organize code into functions or classes.
  • If needed, this is when you make changes to improve the performance of the code without changing its behavior. You can optimize algorithms, reduce memory usage, and improve execution speed.
  • Structure the code that will make it easy to understand, modify, and extend in the future. Usually, you might need to break down large functions into smaller, more manageable pieces and add comments if you need to.
  • After refactoring, run all tests again so that you're sure that the changes didn’t introduce new issues. This is to verify that the code remains correct and functions as it's supposed to.

With the TDD cycle, developers can integrate security considerations in each stage of SDLC. Writing the tests before coding will force the developers to think first about potential securities upfront for a more secure code from the beginning.

Benefits of TDD in Improving Security

  1. Developers will be able to anticipate and address security concerns early.
  2. Security tests will run continuously to catch new vulnerabilities as the code progresses.
  3. The codebase will be maintained and the chances of security flaws will be minimal.
  4. There will be living documentation that will make it easier for teams to understand the security requirements of the code.
  5. The time spent on debugging will be significantly reduced.
  6. The habit of writing tests for every piece of functionality will be developed and there will be consistent comprehensive test coverage and better detection of potential security issues.
  7. Integration issues will be identified and resolved early.
  8. The code will be simpler and more understandable, which will make reviewing for security flaws easier.
  9. Developers will gain confidence in their code, knowing that it has been thoroughly tested for security vulnerabilities.
  10. There will be better collaboration between teams as tests clearly define the expected behavior of the code.

Current Practices in Security Testing

Here's what security testing looks like for many organizations: security tests are usually conducted towards the end of the process, typically during the final stages of testing and development. It's also known as security after the fact. The problem here is you’ll only detect and mitigate vulnerabilities after the main development has been wrapped up. There will be penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, and code reviews, usually performed by specialized security teams.

Challenges of Late-Stage Security Testing

Here's what you can expect if you test late in the development cycle:

Delayed detection

It’s going to be expensive and time-consuming to fix vulnerabilities if they are detected late in the SDLC. The later an issue is discovered, the more complex and disruptive it can be to resolve. Usually, you'd have to modify the code and retest.

More expensive

If you fix security flaws later, it's going to cost you more money compared to addressing them during the initial coding stages. There will be costs associated with patching the software, retesting, and potentially delaying the release.

Flexibility will be reduced

Late-stage testing will limit the development team's flexibility to implement comprehensive security measures. There will be tight deadlines and impending release dates, and the focus will be more on making quick fixes instead of thorough solutions.

Higher risk of overlooked issues

When security testing is rushed at the end of the cycle, it’s more common than not to miss vulnerabilities. Comprehensive testing will give you enough time to be thorough, which is usually not the case in the final stages.

Problems with integration

There are security vulnerabilities that could impact the system architecture and integration points. If these are only detected during the final stages of the development process, you’ll face more refactoring which eventually ends up with more delays.

Limited scope

The focus of late-stage security tests is focused primarily on obvious or high-risk vulnerabilities. It's very easy to overlook less obvious but equally dangerous issues.

How Does Unit Testing Compare to Other Types of Testing?

It's important that you have an understanding of how unit testing fits into the broader spectrum of software testing. Let’s see how it compares to other types of testing:

Integration Testing vs Unit Testing

Integration testing is when you examine the interaction between integrated units or components to make sure that different parts of the product are working together as expected.

  • Scope: Groups of units/modules working together.
  • Responsibility: Can be performed by developers or dedicated testers.
  • Frequency: Conducted after unit tests and before system testing.
  • Benefits: Identifies issues in interactions between components to make sure that modules work together, and validate interface contracts.

System Testing vs Unit Testing

System testing involves testing the complete and integrated software system to make sure that the entire system functions based on specific requirements.

  • Scope: Entire application, including interfaces with other systems.
  • Responsibility: Typically performed by a separate testing team.
  • Frequency: Conducted after integration testing, before acceptance testing.
  • Benefits: Validates end-to-end functionality, ensures system compliance with requirements, and identifies defects in a fully integrated system.

Acceptance Testing vs Unit Testing

Acceptance testing will validate the software against business requirements and user needs. It's the final level of testing before the software is released to production.

  • Scope: Overall behavior of the system from an end-user perspective.
  • Responsibility: Performed by QA teams and end-users.
  • Frequency: Conducted after system testing, before the final release.
  • Benefits: Guarantee the software meets business and user requirements, facilitates user acceptance, and validates the system's readiness for production.

Security Testing vs Unit Testing

Security testing is focused on finding and detecting vulnerabilities and security issues within the software to make sure that the product is secure against potential threats and attacks.

  • Scope: Security aspects of the application, including data protection, access control, and threat resistance.
  • Responsibility: Typically performed by security specialists.
  • Frequency: Conducted throughout the development lifecycle, often intensified before release.
  • Benefits: Identifies security vulnerabilities, ensures compliance with security standards, and protects against potential threats.

Performance Testing vs Unit Testing

Performance testing assesses the speed, responsiveness, and stability of a system under a particular workload. It includes load testing, stress testing, and scalability testing.

  • Scope: System’s performance characteristics under various conditions.
  • Responsibility: Performed by performance engineers or testers.
  • Frequency: Conducted during and after development phases.
  • Benefits: Makes sure that the system can handle expected load, detect performance bottlenecks, and validates scalability.

Regression Testing vs Unit Testing

Regression testing involves re-running previously conducted tests to make sure that new changes have not negatively impacted existing functionalities.

  • Scope: All or selected test cases from the existing test suite.
  • Responsibility: Can be performed by developers or QA testers.
  • Frequency: Conducted after any code changes, updates, or enhancements.
  • Benefits: Makes sure that new changes do not break existing functionality, maintains software stability, and verifies bug fixes.

Knowing which is which when it comes to testing and their unique focuses is important when creating a more comprehensive testing strategy that will cover all aspects of your software's functionality, performance, usability, and security. These types of testing are what's going to make sure that your product is high quality and safe to be deployed for production and operation.

For practical implementation with Python and FastAPI, go check out Abhay's video.

Applications That Are Secure From The Ground Up

Knowing how to incorporate security unit testing and TDD into your development workflow is a powerful strategy to improve the security and robustness of your applications. I’ve said it, and I will say it again: addressing security concerns early will prevent vulnerabilities from becoming critical issues and build a security-conscious development culture. These practices need to be implemented today in your development process if you want products that are secure from design to deployment.

As for experts, don't you think it's cheaper to take advantage of your existing talents than to hire new people that you have to advertise for, interview, check backgrounds, and then eventually train? Actually, this is our specialization. AppSecEngineer, with our team of experts, has trained all over the world about a wide range of subject matter related to application security. It doesn't matter if you’ve been in the industry for decades, just starting out or you have a team that needs security training, I’m sure we have something that will be a valuable addition to your skillset.

We've already helped a lot of companies and individuals, it's your turn.

Abhay Bhargav

Blog Author
Abhay is a speaker and trainer at major industry events including DEF CON, BlackHat, OWASP AppSecUSA. He loves golf (don't get him started).

Ready to Elevate Your Security Training?

Empower your teams with the skills they need to secure your applications and stay ahead of the curve.
Get Started Now
X
X
Copyright AppSecEngineer © 2025